Present: 20 students, Robin Hirsch (Chair), John
Washbrook, Graham Roberts, Jill Saunders.
Points raised:
3. Perceptions about Computer Science as a discipline
Few of those attending claimed to have a very clear
idea about what Computer Science was all about when applying for this programme.
There was a suggestion that when attending for interview it would have
been useful to have a presentation about something more relevant to new
undergraduates rather than research issues. RDH/JW agreed to investigate.
4. Tutorial System
RDH explained that the tutorial system was slightly
different in Year 2. Whereas Year 1 tutorials would normally address
course-related issues. Year 2 tutorials would focus on transferable skills.
Several students among those present indicated that they had found the
tutorial groups were helpful.
5. Program Advisory Service
Only a few students had used the Program Advisory
Service. It was suggested that it needed to be better advertised,
and that there should be some way of making it clear who the students on
duty were (badges?). GAR pointed out that the Program Advisory Service
could be really useful to the students in year 2, as the department does
not have the capacity to organise 2nd year lab sessions.
6. On-line feedback forms (course evaluation)
One of the students suggested that more people would
fill in forms and give feedback about the courses if paper copies were
handed out to be completed during a lecture rather than on-line.
Jill Saunders